On Mon, 14 May 2007, Bob Johnston wrote: > Alan Cox <alan <at> lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes: > > > > Why not just use the terms: > > > * outdated - as a replacement for "deprecated". > > > > Because they don't actually mean the same thing ? > > "superseded" would probably be a better word, perhaps lacking the > negative connotations of "deprecated"
except that you *want* the negative connotation associated with the word "deprecated." you don't just want to say something's been superseded. rather, you want to say that it's not only been superseded but that you really want people to *stop using it* and move up to the newer version; otherwise, there is no motivation to upgrade. i'm just baffled by the resistance to the word "deprecated" since it represents *exactly* the idea you want to get across here. its use in software projects is well-established. why are some people so put off by it? > I'm just trying to propose an alternative because it seems that > deprecated/obsolete causes some confusion. no, it does *not* cause confusion. by now, everyone who's been following this thread knows *exactly* what those two words are being proposed to represent. what's happening is that they don't *like* that proposed usage. quite simply, there is no confusion here, there is simply annoying obstinacy. there's a difference. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/