4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> commit 69c0319aabba45bcf33178916a2f06967b4adede upstream. It's fairly large and it has quite a few callers. This may also help untangle some headers down the road. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54f3367803e7f80b2be62c8a21879aa74b1a5f57.1461688545.git.l...@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 98 ----------------------------------- arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h @@ -104,103 +104,9 @@ static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct #endif } -static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, - struct task_struct *tsk) -{ - unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id(); +extern void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, + struct task_struct *tsk); - if (likely(prev != next)) { -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK); - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm, next); -#endif - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); - - /* - * Re-load page tables. - * - * This logic has an ordering constraint: - * - * CPU 0: Write to a PTE for 'next' - * CPU 0: load bit 1 in mm_cpumask. if nonzero, send IPI. - * CPU 1: set bit 1 in next's mm_cpumask - * CPU 1: load from the PTE that CPU 0 writes (implicit) - * - * We need to prevent an outcome in which CPU 1 observes - * the new PTE value and CPU 0 observes bit 1 clear in - * mm_cpumask. (If that occurs, then the IPI will never - * be sent, and CPU 0's TLB will contain a stale entry.) - * - * The bad outcome can occur if either CPU's load is - * reordered before that CPU's store, so both CPUs must - * execute full barriers to prevent this from happening. - * - * Thus, switch_mm needs a full barrier between the - * store to mm_cpumask and any operation that could load - * from next->pgd. TLB fills are special and can happen - * due to instruction fetches or for no reason at all, - * and neither LOCK nor MFENCE orders them. - * Fortunately, load_cr3() is serializing and gives the - * ordering guarantee we need. - * - */ - load_cr3(next->pgd); - - trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL); - - /* Stop flush ipis for the previous mm */ - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev)); - - /* Load per-mm CR4 state */ - load_mm_cr4(next); - -#ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL - /* - * Load the LDT, if the LDT is different. - * - * It's possible that prev->context.ldt doesn't match - * the LDT register. This can happen if leave_mm(prev) - * was called and then modify_ldt changed - * prev->context.ldt but suppressed an IPI to this CPU. - * In this case, prev->context.ldt != NULL, because we - * never set context.ldt to NULL while the mm still - * exists. That means that next->context.ldt != - * prev->context.ldt, because mms never share an LDT. - */ - if (unlikely(prev->context.ldt != next->context.ldt)) - load_mm_ldt(next); -#endif - } -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - else { - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK); - BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm) != next); - - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) { - /* - * On established mms, the mm_cpumask is only changed - * from irq context, from ptep_clear_flush() while in - * lazy tlb mode, and here. Irqs are blocked during - * schedule, protecting us from simultaneous changes. - */ - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); - - /* - * We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled - * tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload CR3 - * to make sure to use no freed page tables. - * - * As above, load_cr3() is serializing and orders TLB - * fills with respect to the mm_cpumask write. - */ - load_cr3(next->pgd); - trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL); - load_mm_cr4(next); - load_mm_ldt(next); - } - } -#endif -} #define activate_mm(prev, next) \ do { \ --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c @@ -59,6 +59,108 @@ void leave_mm(int cpu) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leave_mm); +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ + +void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next, + struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id(); + + if (likely(prev != next)) { +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK); + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm, next); +#endif + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); + + /* + * Re-load page tables. + * + * This logic has an ordering constraint: + * + * CPU 0: Write to a PTE for 'next' + * CPU 0: load bit 1 in mm_cpumask. if nonzero, send IPI. + * CPU 1: set bit 1 in next's mm_cpumask + * CPU 1: load from the PTE that CPU 0 writes (implicit) + * + * We need to prevent an outcome in which CPU 1 observes + * the new PTE value and CPU 0 observes bit 1 clear in + * mm_cpumask. (If that occurs, then the IPI will never + * be sent, and CPU 0's TLB will contain a stale entry.) + * + * The bad outcome can occur if either CPU's load is + * reordered before that CPU's store, so both CPUs must + * execute full barriers to prevent this from happening. + * + * Thus, switch_mm needs a full barrier between the + * store to mm_cpumask and any operation that could load + * from next->pgd. TLB fills are special and can happen + * due to instruction fetches or for no reason at all, + * and neither LOCK nor MFENCE orders them. + * Fortunately, load_cr3() is serializing and gives the + * ordering guarantee we need. + * + */ + load_cr3(next->pgd); + + trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL); + + /* Stop flush ipis for the previous mm */ + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev)); + + /* Load per-mm CR4 state */ + load_mm_cr4(next); + +#ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL + /* + * Load the LDT, if the LDT is different. + * + * It's possible that prev->context.ldt doesn't match + * the LDT register. This can happen if leave_mm(prev) + * was called and then modify_ldt changed + * prev->context.ldt but suppressed an IPI to this CPU. + * In this case, prev->context.ldt != NULL, because we + * never set context.ldt to NULL while the mm still + * exists. That means that next->context.ldt != + * prev->context.ldt, because mms never share an LDT. + */ + if (unlikely(prev->context.ldt != next->context.ldt)) + load_mm_ldt(next); +#endif + } +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + else { + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK); + BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm) != next); + + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) { + /* + * On established mms, the mm_cpumask is only changed + * from irq context, from ptep_clear_flush() while in + * lazy tlb mode, and here. Irqs are blocked during + * schedule, protecting us from simultaneous changes. + */ + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); + + /* + * We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled + * tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload CR3 + * to make sure to use no freed page tables. + * + * As above, load_cr3() is serializing and orders TLB + * fills with respect to the mm_cpumask write. + */ + load_cr3(next->pgd); + trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL); + load_mm_cr4(next); + load_mm_ldt(next); + } + } +#endif +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + /* * The flush IPI assumes that a thread switch happens in this order: * [cpu0: the cpu that switches]
