On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the CC, I'm temporarily very busy so if there's something > urgent, safer to CC.
Hi, syzbot uses get_maintainer.pl and for fs/userfaultfd.c you are not there, so if you want to be CCed please add yourself to MAINTAINERS. > This passed both testcases, the hard part was already done. I'm glad > there was nothing wrong in the previous fix that had to be redone. > > Simply we forgot to undo the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL after > aborting the new child uffd ctx, the original code of course didn't do > that either. > > Having just seen this issue, this isn't very well tested. > > Thank you, > Andrea > > Andrea Arcangeli (1): > userfaultfd: clear the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx if UFFD_EVENT_FORK > fails > > fs/userfaultfd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) The original report footer was stripped, so: Please credit me with: Reported-by: syzbot <syzkal...@googlegroups.com> and we also need to tell syzbot about the fix with: #syz fix: userfaultfd: clear the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx if UFFD_EVENT_FORK fails
