On 2017/12/24 17:27, Christian König wrote:
> Am 24.12.2017 um 07:14 schrieb Tan Xiaojun:
>> From: Michal Srb <m...@suse.com>
>>
>> The io_mem_pfn field was added in commit
>> ea642c3216cb2a60d1c0e760ae47ee85c9c16447
>> and is called unconditionally. However, not all drivers were updated to set
>> it.
>>
>> Use the ttm_bo_default_io_mem_pfn function if a driver did not set its own.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Srb <m...@suse.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> index c8ebb75..e25a99b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> @@ -234,7 +234,10 @@ static int ttm_bo_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> if (bo->mem.bus.is_iomem) {
>> /* Iomem should not be marked encrypted */
>> cvma.vm_page_prot = pgprot_decrypted(cvma.vm_page_prot);
>> - pfn = bdev->driver->io_mem_pfn(bo, page_offset);
>> + if (bdev->driver->io_mem_pfn)
>> + pfn = bdev->driver->io_mem_pfn(bo, page_offset);
>> + else
>> + pfn = ttm_bo_default_io_mem_pfn(bo, page_offset);
>
> Please move this check into a new function ttm_bo_io_mem_pfn().
>
> You can then move the calculation of ttm_bo_default_io_mem_pfn() into this
> new function in patch #12 as well.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
OK. Thank you for your reply. I will modify it and send v2.
Thanks.
Xiaojun.
>> } else {
>> page = ttm->pages[page_offset];
>> if (unlikely(!page && i == 0)) {
>
>
> .
>
