On Mon, 14 May 2007 13:02:42 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > Does "that" have name? I can find no patch in -mm which appears to have > > anything to do with SMP consolidation, and this patch applies cleanly to > > the current -mm lineup. > > > Sorry, I thought you'd picked this up: > > > Subject: i386: move common parts of smp into their own file > > Several parts of kernel/smp.c and smpboot.c are generally useful for > other subarchitectures and paravirt_ops implementations, so make them > available for reuse. Confused. This patch conflicts a lot with James's one (which I named voyager-fix-build-broken-by-shift-to-smp_ops.patch). If your "i386: move common parts of smp into their own file" also fixes Voyager and is preferred then cool, but a) the changelog should tell us that and b) could James please test it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
