On Tue, 15 May 2007, Heikki Orsila wrote: > Both __pure and __attribute_pure__ are the same, and I found out that > there is only a handful of users for these. __attribute_pure__ is > used in approximately 15 places, and __pure is not used anywhere. > > Is either __pure or __attribute_pure__ preferred? Imo, __pure looks > much nicer than __attribute_pure__ so we could do a replacement.
that was pretty much the point of my earlier post -- given the precedent for all of the other short forms, there seems to be no reason not to simply use "__pure" and delete the longer definition. i'll post a patch for that shortly. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/