On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:31:30AM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 08:05:43PM -0800, Azhar Shaikh wrote:
> >>
> >>> - return tpm_chip_register(chip);
> >>> + rc = tpm_chip_register(chip);
> >>> + if (rc && is_bsw())
> >>> + iounmap(priv->ilb_base_addr);
> >>> +
> >>> + return rc;
> >>> out_err:
> >>> tpm_tis_remove(chip);
> >>> + if (is_bsw())
> >>> + iounmap(priv->ilb_base_addr);
> >>> +
> >>> return rc;
> >>> }
> >>
> >>I thought you were resending this to fix the above, why is is it still
> >>wonky?
> >>
> >
> >Oh! I fixed it in the second patch ("tpm: Keep CLKRUN enabled throughout
> >the duration of transmit_cmd()"). Should have fixed in this patch instead. My
> >bad, didn't see it was introduced in this patch. I thought it was part of
> >second
> >patch. Will fix this.
> >
>
> On checking, the ops->clk_enable is not still introduced yet. It is
> introduced in the second patch. The cleanup is done in the next patch.
> So do you want me to still fix this here?
Try hard to not edit your own patches in your series. No reason why
iounmap cannot be put into tpm_tis_remove in the first place
Jason
