On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 08:18 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > I hate to say this, but I think Intel should postpone CET until the > dust settles.
CET isn't a *problem* for retpoline. We've had a CET-compatible version for a while now, and I posted it earlier. It's just that Andi was working from an older version of my patches. Of course, there's a school of thought that says that Intel should postpone *everything* until this is all fixed sanely, but there's nothing special about CET in that respect.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature