On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 06:12:18PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com>
> 
> Set IBRS upon kernel entrance via syscall and interrupts. Clear it
> upon exit.  IBRS protects against unsafe indirect branching predictions
> in the kernel.
> 
> The NMI interrupt save/restore of IBRS state was based on Andrea
> Arcangeli's implementation.
> Here's an explanation by Dave Hansen on why we save IBRS state for NMI.
> 
> The normal interrupt code uses the 'error_entry' path which uses the
> Code Segment (CS) of the instruction that was interrupted to tell
> whether it interrupted the kernel or userspace and thus has to switch
> IBRS, or leave it alone.
> 
> The NMI code is different.  It uses 'paranoid_entry' because it can
> interrupt the kernel while it is running with a userspace IBRS (and %GS
> and CR3) value, but has a kernel CS.  If we used the same approach as
> the normal interrupt code, we might do the following;
> 
>       SYSENTER_entry
> <-------------- NMI HERE
>       IBRS=1
>               do_something()
>       IBRS=0
>       SYSRET
> 
> The NMI code might notice that we are running in the kernel and decide
> that it is OK to skip the IBRS=1.  This would leave it running
> unprotected with IBRS=0, which is bad.
> 
> However, if we unconditionally set IBRS=1, in the NMI, we might get the
> following case:
> 
>       SYSENTER_entry
>       IBRS=1
>               do_something()
>       IBRS=0
> <-------------- NMI HERE (set IBRS=1)
>       SYSRET
> 
> and we would return to userspace with IBRS=1.  Userspace would run
> slowly until we entered and exited the kernel again.
> 
> Instead of those two approaches, we chose a third one where we simply
> save the IBRS value in a scratch register (%r13) and then restore that
> value, verbatim.

That's one helluva commit message. This is how you write commit
messages!

> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Reply via email to