Best Regards! Anson Huang
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 2018-01-08 7:34 AM > To: Anson Huang <[email protected]> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>; linux-arm- > [email protected]; [email protected]; Linux PM <linux- > [email protected]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > [email protected]>; Shawn Guo <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer > <[email protected]>; Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>; Rob > Herring <[email protected]>; Mark Rutland <[email protected]>; > Russell King - ARM Linux <[email protected]>; Viresh Kumar > <[email protected]>; Jacky Bai <[email protected]>; A.s. Dong > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q: add 696MHz operating point for > i.mx6ul > > On Saturday, January 6, 2018 4:05:41 AM CET Anson Huang wrote: > > Hi, Rafael > > > > Best Regards! > > Anson Huang > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > > Rafael J. Wysocki > > > Sent: 2018-01-05 8:21 PM > > > To: Anson Huang <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; Linux PM <[email protected]>; > > > Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- [email protected]>; Shawn Guo > > > <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>; Fabio > > > Estevam <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; > > > Mark Rutland <[email protected]>; Russell King - ARM Linux > > > <[email protected]>; Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>; > > > Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>; Jacky Bai > > > <[email protected]>; A.s. Dong <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q: add 696MHz operating point > > > for i.mx6ul > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Anson Huang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Add 696MHz operating point for i.MX6UL, only for those parts with > > > > speed grading fuse set to 2b'10 supports 696MHz operating point, > > > > so, speed grading check is also added for i.MX6UL in this patch, > > > > the clock tree for each operating point are as below: > > > > > > > > 696MHz: > > > > pll1 696000000 > > > > pll1_bypass 696000000 > > > > pll1_sys 696000000 > > > > pll1_sw 696000000 > > > > arm 696000000 > > > > 528MHz: > > > > pll2 528000000 > > > > pll2_bypass 528000000 > > > > pll2_bus 528000000 > > > > ca7_secondary_sel 528000000 > > > > step 528000000 > > > > pll1_sw 528000000 > > > > arm 528000000 > > > > 396MHz: > > > > pll2_pfd2_396m 396000000 > > > > ca7_secondary_sel 396000000 > > > > step 396000000 > > > > pll1_sw 396000000 > > > > arm 396000000 > > > > 198MHz: > > > > pll2_pfd2_396m 396000000 > > > > ca7_secondary_sel 396000000 > > > > step 396000000 > > > > pll1_sw 396000000 > > > > arm 198000000 > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]> > > > > > > This doesn't apply for me and in a nontrivial way. > > > > > > What kernel is it against? > > > > I did it based on linux-next, it should be on linux-next-pm branch, I > > redo the patch set V2 based on linux-next-pm, also redo the test, > > sorry for the inconvenience. > > But you didn't add the Reviewed-by: tags from Fabio to them. > > Was that on purpose or by mistake? > > Thanks, > Rafael It was my mistake, I thought it will be added by maintainer, I will add them and set a V3 patch set. Thanks. Anson.
