<dropping trivial@ from cc: as this definitly isn't>
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:17:11PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig 2007-04-27
> 11:49:26.000000000 -1000
> +++ linux-2.6.21.1/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig 2007-05-15
> 14:48:50.000000000 -1000
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config X86_POWERNOW_K8
> tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> + depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
> help
> This adds the CPUFreq driver for mobile AMD Opteron/Athlon64
> processors.
This is completely the wrong thing to do.
There's no dependancy between these two modules, as they are two independant
cpufreq drivers. I think you may be confused with X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
(Which should get set if you have ACPI_PROCESSOR enabled)
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
