On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Pavel Machek wrote: > > First, what is going on with X86_BUG_AMD_E400 and X86_BUG_AMD_APIC_C1E > ? They seem to refer to the same bug, perhaps comment should mention > that? (Do we need two flags for one bug?) > > Next, maybe X86_BUG_CPU_INSECURE is a bit too generic? This seems to > address "Meltdown" problem, but not "Spectre". Should it be limited to > PPro and newer Intel CPUs? > > Should another erratum be added for "Spectre"? This is present even on > AMD CPUs, but should not be present in 486, maybe Pentium, and some > Atom chips? > > Plus... is this reasonable interface? > > bugs : cpu_insecure
We've renamed it to meltdown already and added spectre_v1/v2 bits for the rest of the mess.
