Quoting Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On May 16 2007 10:38, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >>
> >> >+lookup_union:
> >> >+ do {
> >> >+ struct vfsmount *mnt = find_mnt(topmost);
> >> >+ UM_DEBUG_DCACHE("name=\"%s\", inode=%p, device=%s\n",
> >> >+ topmost->d_name.name, topmost->d_inode,
> >> >+ mnt->mnt_devname);
> >> >+ mntput(mnt);
> >> >+ } while (0);
> >>
> >> Why the extra do{}while? [elsewhere too]
> >
> >Not sure, may be to get a scope to define 'mnt' here. Jan ?
>
> What I was implicitly suggesting that mnt could be moved into the
> normal 'function scope'.
>
>
> Jan
This code can't stay anyway so it's kind of moot. find_mnt() is bogus,
and the topmost and overlaid mappings need to be changed from
dentry->dentry to (vfsmnt,dentry)->(vfsmnt,dentry) in order to cope with
bind mounts and mount namespaces.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
