On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:04:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Looks like SAS needs to require CONFIG_ATA... > > > > Yes, but it seems wrong to disable all of libsas if !ATA. Only sas_ata.o > should depend on that. > > Darrick, is there any point in me carrying this tree? It doesn't appear to > be a hotbed of activity...
Nope. I haven't worked on those bits of code in quite a while, since a number of scsi/libata reorganizations were discussed at the storage summit that would make a fair amount of the sas_ata code unnecessary (or candidates for reworking). --D
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
