Hello, Paolo. On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:00:02PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: > The solution for the second type of parameters may prove useful to > unify also the computation of statistics for the throttling policy. > > Does this proposal sound reasonable?
So, the above should work too but I wonder whether we could do this simpler. Frankly, I wouldn't mind if cfq and bfq can't be mixed on a system - e.g. they can be built together but you can't enable bfq on some devides and cfq on others. If we do that, all we need to do is just removing / adding cftypes when either gets activated which cgroup already does. Thanks. -- tejun
