Hello, Steven. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:18:27AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > My point is, that your test is only hammering at a single CPU. You say > it is the scenario you see, which means that the OOM is printing out > more than it should, because if it prints it out once, it should not > print it out again for the same process, or go into a loop doing it > over and over on a single CPU. That would be a bug in the > implementation.
That's not what's happening. You're not actually reading what I'm writing. Can you please go back and re-read the scenario I've been describing over and over again. Thanks. -- tejun