[PATCH] bluetooth: fix locking in hci_sock_dev_event()

We presently use lock_sock() to acquire a lock on a socket in
hci_sock_dev_event(), but this goes BUG because lock_sock()
can sleep and we're already holding a read-write spinlock at
that point. So, we must use the non-sleeping BH version,
bh_lock_sock().

However, hci_sock_dev_event() is called from user context and
hence using simply bh_lock_sock() will deadlock against a
concurrent softirq that tries to acquire a lock on the same
socket. Hence, disabling BH's before acquiring the socket lock
and enable them afterwards, is the proper solution to fix
socket locking in hci_sock_dev_event().

Cc: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

 net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

---

diff -ruNp a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c  2007-05-16 17:31:06.000000000 +0530
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c  2007-05-16 17:38:35.000000000 +0530
@@ -665,7 +665,8 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct not
                /* Detach sockets from device */
                read_lock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
                sk_for_each(sk, node, &hci_sk_list.head) {
-                       lock_sock(sk);
+                       local_bh_disable();
+                       bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
                        if (hci_pi(sk)->hdev == hdev) {
                                hci_pi(sk)->hdev = NULL;
                                sk->sk_err = EPIPE;
@@ -674,7 +675,8 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct not

                                hci_dev_put(hdev);
                        }
-                       release_sock(sk);
+                       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+                       local_bh_enable();
                }
                read_unlock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
        }

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to