On 10-01-18, 10:54, Olof Johansson wrote: > The SoC-specific pieces should preferrably go under drivers/soc > instead, to reduce cross-tree dependencies when introducing new SoC > variants. > > They're more related to the SoC than to the boot_constraint framework anyway.
Hmm, okay. > Bikeshed: We've traditionally had really terse and precise names under > drivers/. This is the first verbose one with a _ in it. Maybe find a > shorter name or just concatenate to 'bootconstraints'? We didn't call > it remote_proc or rapid_io, etc, either. :) Sure. -- viresh