* Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:18:05PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 04:57:35PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > Here's few changes to x86 decompression code. > > > > > > > > The first patch is pure cosmetic change: it gives file with KASLR > > > > helpers > > > > a proper name. > > > > > > > > The last three patches bring support of booting into 5-level paging > > > > mode if > > > > a bootloader put the kernel above 4G. > > > > > > > > Patch 2/4 Renames l5_paging_required() into paging_prepare() and change > > > > interface of the function. > > > > Patch 3/4 Handles allocation of space for trampoline and gets it > > > > prepared. > > > > Patch 4/4 Gets trampoline used. > > > > > > > > Kirill A. Shutemov (4): > > > > x86/boot/compressed/64: Rename pagetable.c to kaslr_64.c > > > > x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce paging_prepare() > > > > x86/boot/compressed/64: Prepare trampoline memory > > > > x86/boot/compressed/64: Handle 5-level paging boot if kernel is above > > > > 4G > > > > > > Ingo, does it look fine now? > > > > Yes, it looks structurally much better now - but we first need to address > > all > > existing regressions before we can move forward. > > There's a fix for kdump issue that maintainers are okay about.
Do you mean your proposed fix in: Message-ID: <[email protected]> ? I was expecting a final submission of that fix in a new thread (or at least with a new subject line), with all Acked-by and Tested-by's collected and Reported-by added in. > Is there any other regression do you have in mind? No, that's the main one I was worried about. Thanks, Ingo
