+ Chris Packham who's been fixing some stuff in here too.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 08:28:21AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Reorder the error handling code in order to release the resources in
> reverse order than allocation.
>
> Introduce a new 'release_group' label in the error handling path and use
> it to void some code duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> index 3c68bb525d5d..aa5bc1d8f424 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> @@ -450,8 +450,8 @@ static int mv64x60_cpu_err_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> "cpu", 1, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, 0,
> edac_dev_idx);
> if (!edac_dev) {
> - devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, mv64x60_cpu_err_probe);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + res = -ENOMEM;
> + goto release_group;
> }
>
> pdata = edac_dev->pvt_info;
> @@ -561,8 +561,9 @@ static int mv64x60_cpu_err_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> err2:
> edac_device_del_device(&pdev->dev);
> err:
> - devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, mv64x60_cpu_err_probe);
> edac_device_free_ctl_info(edac_dev);
> +release_group:
> + devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, mv64x60_cpu_err_probe);
> return res;
> }
>
> --
Thanks, looks good. But looking at this driver, mv64x60_mc_err_probe()
and mv64x60_sram_err_probe() have the same problem too. Can you address them
with your patch too pls?
Also, if you feel like fixing more stuff in this driver, it doesn't use
the edac_printk() infrastructure but naked printk() calls. It could be
converted to it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
