On 12 January 2018 at 10:41, David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote: > From: Crt Mori [mailto:c...@melexis.com] >> Sent: 09 January 2018 15:18 >> >> It has been some time now since this moved. I have decided not to use >> David's implementation because I want to maintain also range above >> 2^62 > > The last version I did supported the full range.
Nothing changed below that comment, so I was assuming it is not supported (or did I miss a mail?). Also fls discussion had opposite opinions or it just seems inconclusive to me? > > David > So you all agree David Laight version is much better and should be used instead of currently proposed version?
