4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
commit aa1f10e85b0ab53dee85d8e293c8159d18d293a8 upstream.
class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mux/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mux/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct devi
return dev->of_node == data;
}
+/* Note this function returns a reference to the mux_chip dev. */
static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
{
struct device *dev;
@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(stru
(!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
np, args.np);
+ put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -476,10 +478,10 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(stru
if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
np, controller, args.np);
+ put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
- get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mux_control_get);
