4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4...@gmail.com>
commit 29b75eb2d56a714190a93d7be4525e617591077a upstream.
Commit e91467ecd1ef ("bug in futex unqueue_me") introduced a barrier() in
unqueue_me() to prevent the compiler from rereading the lock pointer which
might change after a check for NULL.
Replace the barrier() with a READ_ONCE() for the following reasons:
1) READ_ONCE() is a weaker form of barrier() that affects only the specific
load operation, while barrier() is a general compiler level memory barrier.
READ_ONCE() was not available at the time when the barrier was added.
2) Aside of that READ_ONCE() is descriptive and self explainatory while a
barrier without comment is not clear to the casual reader.
No functional change.
[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: d...@stgolabs.net
Cc: pet...@infradead.org
Cc: li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org
Cc: fengguang...@intel.com
Cc: bige...@linutronix.de
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457314344-5685-1-git-send-email-nasa4...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbu...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/futex.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1939,8 +1939,12 @@ static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
/* In the common case we don't take the spinlock, which is nice. */
retry:
- lock_ptr = q->lock_ptr;
- barrier();
+ /*
+ * q->lock_ptr can change between this read and the following spin_lock.
+ * Use READ_ONCE to forbid the compiler from reloading q->lock_ptr and
+ * optimizing lock_ptr out of the logic below.
+ */
+ lock_ptr = READ_ONCE(q->lock_ptr);
if (lock_ptr != NULL) {
spin_lock(lock_ptr);
/*
