* Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > Did anyone else notice the > > [ 31.068198] ? vmalloc_sync_all+0x150/0x150 > > present in a bunch of the stack traces? That should be pretty uncommon.
I thikn that's pretty unusual:
> Is it just part of the normal do_page_fault() stack and the stack
> dumper picks up on it?
No, it should only be called by register_die_notifier(), which is not part of
the
regular stack dump, AFAICS.
Thanks,
Ingo
