On Fri, 18 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:46:02 -0700 Linda Walsh wrote:
> > If the standard that other architectures are using is to put their > > devices in the crypto directory, then one might expect all crypto > > devices to be there. Why should s390 stick out and put its crypto > > device someplace under the s390 tree, forcing parts of the s390 > > tree to be included when building other architectures? > > drivers/crypto/ currently contains drivers for x86_32 and s390 (the > latter by indirection, which is what is causing you this > grief/problem/whatever), but it certainly looks like it could be a > home for crypto drivers on any arch. this all sounds vaguely familiar. oh, wait ... http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/28/212 rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
