On 01/20/2018 09:28 AM, Éric Leblond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 20 janv. 2018 9:21 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> a écrit :
>
> On 01/20/2018 03:27 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 03:00:37AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >> On 01/19/2018 12:43 AM, Eric Leblond wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> This patchset rebases the libbpf code on latest bpf-next code and
> addresses
> >>> remarks by Daniel.
> >>
> >> Ok, I think it's a good start. We should later on clean up the
> >> netlink handling code a bit, but that's all internal and can be
> >> done in a second step. Applied to bpf-next, thanks Eric.
> >
> > Sorry, Eric, Daniel.
> > I had to revert this patch set. It breaks build on systems
> > where headers are not the most recent.
>
> Oops, sorry.
>
> > Since libbpf is used by perf it has to be built cleanly on centos7 at
> least.
> >
> > The errors I got:
> > bpf.c: In function ‘bpf_set_link_xdp_fd’:
> > bpf.c:456:23: error: ‘SOL_NETLINK’ undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> > if (setsockopt(sock, SOL_NETLINK, NETLINK_EXT_ACK,
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > bpf.c:456:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> for
> each function it appears in
> > bpf.c:456:36: error: ‘NETLINK_EXT_ACK’ undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> > if (setsockopt(sock, SOL_NETLINK, NETLINK_EXT_ACK,
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > nlattr.c: In function ‘nla_dump_errormsg’:
> > nlattr.c:152:34: error: ‘NLMSGERR_ATTR_MAX’ undeclared (first use in
> this
> function)
> > struct nla_policy extack_policy[NLMSGERR_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>
> Yeah, fully agree, thanks for catching this, Alexei!
>
> What's the recommended solution here ? Include some kernel tree files or
> define
> constant if not defined ?
I think typical way is to pull such headers into tools/include/.
Cheers,
Daniel
