On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:49:04 -0500 Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:46:50 +0100 > Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > No fundamental objections from me, assuming they are well tested. > > > > Yeah, I ran it through my ftrace test suite, and they did fine till I > hit test 20 of 34, which tests static ftrace (CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE not > set), and it crashed. I'm hoping to have it fixed and retested today. > Looking at the crash output, it was hung tasks and not an actual crash. This is the first time I ran this test on 4.15-rc9, I'll make sure it's not something associated with rc9 before blaming my patches. With DYNAMIC_FTRACE disabled, the machine runs much slower. With all the PTI work, it could possibly pushed it passed a breaking point. -- Steve
