On 01/22/2018, 09:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Li Jinyue <lijin...@huawei.com>
>
> commit fbe0e839d1e22d88810f3ee3e2f1479be4c0aa4a upstream.
>
> UBSAN reports signed integer overflow in kernel/futex.c:
>
> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/futex.c:2041:18
> signed integer overflow:
> 0 - -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int'
>
> Add a sanity check to catch negative values of nr_wake and nr_requeue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Jinyue <lijin...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: pet...@infradead.org
> Cc: dvh...@infradead.org
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513242294-31786-1-git-send-email-lijin...@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1878,6 +1878,9 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uad
> struct futex_q *this, *next;
> DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
>
> + if (nr_wake < 0 || nr_requeue < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
This breaks strace's test suite on 4.14.15 (and is present in upstream
obviously too):
futex(0x7ff568b44ffc, 0x3, 0xfacefeed, 0xbadda7a0ca7b100d,
0x7ff568b44ffc, 0x9caffee1) = -1: Invalid argument
strace uses weird values in the testkit to pass down to futex as can be
seen. I think like in:
commit e78c38f6bdd900b2ad9ac9df8eff58b745dc5b3c
Author: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
Date: Mon Oct 23 13:41:51 2017 +0200
futex: futex_wake_op, do not fail on invalid op
something similar should be done here too. Maybe:
if (nr_wake < 0)
nr_wake = 0;
if (nr_requeue < 0)
nr_requeue = 0;
?
Maybe also with some pr_info_ratelimited like in the above commit?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
