On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:41:45PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:14:41PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > @@ -32,23 +33,36 @@
> > static long
> > __do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> [...]
> > + if (follow_page(vma, start, 0)) {
> > + ret = __flush_cache_user_range(start, start + chunk);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto done;
> > + }
>
> This looks pretty expensive for pages already in memory. Could we do
> some tricks with the AT instruction in __flush_cache_user_range() so
> that we skip the flushing if the page isn't there? We know that when a
> page is mapped, the cache will get cleaned/invalidated via set_pte_at()
> + sync_icache_dcache(), so the only problem of a race is flushing the
> caches twice for a page. If a page gets unmapped after AT, we may bring
> it back through the cache ops.
Alternatively, we could try to use pagefault_disable()/enable() around
this but we need to make sure we cover all the cases where a page may
not be flushed even when it is actually present (i.e. old pte). For
example, ptep_set_access_flags() skips __sync_icache_dcache().
--
Catalin
