On 01/26/2018 10:38 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
After checking all possible call chains to bcma_pmu_resources_init() here,
my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context,
namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
Thus mdelay can be replaced with usleep_range to avoid busy wait.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com>
---
v2:
* Use usleep_range(2000, 2500), instead of (1500, 2000) in v1.
---
drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
index f1eb4d3..478948c 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void bcma_pmu_resources_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
* Add some delay; allow resources to come up and settle.
* Delay is required for SoC (early init).
*/
- mdelay(2);
+ usleep_range(2000, 2500);
I have no means of testing this patch, but it should be OK.
Acked-by: Larry Finger <larry.fin...@lwfinger.net>
}
/* Disable to allow reading SPROM. Don't know the adventages of enabling it. */
