On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 01:07:52AM +0100, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> The eSDHC does not work properly if the SION bit is not set for the
> bidirectional CMD signal, whatever the eSDHC instance and the selected
> pad. Therefore, setting SION is mandatory for all eSDHC CMD ports. Do
> this for MX25_PAD_*__SD*_CMD in imx25-pinfunc.h in order to enforce this
> behavior for all boards.
> 
> This had already been done for eSDHC1, but not for eSDHC2. Also, define
> MX25_PAD_FEC_MDC__SDHC2_CMD so that all the possible cases are covered
> from now on.

There is an inconsistency in the naming. The eSDHC1 CMD constants are
named:

        MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD

The reference calls this:

        CMD of instance: esdhc1.

The register name is correct though. Not sure it's worth to fix this to
use consistent naming (which would result in:

        MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__ESDHC1_CMD

which looks ugly, too).

> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau....@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h 
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h
> index 6c63dca1b9b8..6cc71f7e1baa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h
> @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@
>  #define MX25_PAD_LD8__LD8                    0x0e8 0x2e0 0x000 0x00 0x000
>  #define MX25_PAD_LD8__UART4_RXD                      0x0e8 0x2e0 0x570 0x02 
> 0x000
>  #define MX25_PAD_LD8__FEC_TX_ERR             0x0e8 0x2e0 0x000 0x05 0x000
> -#define MX25_PAD_LD8__SDHC2_CMD                      0x0e8 0x2e0 0x4e0 0x06 
> 0x000
> +/* The eSDHC cannot work if SION is not set for the bidirectional CMD 
> signal. */

Maybe reference the more verbose comment for MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD
here?

> +#define MX25_PAD_LD8__SDHC2_CMD                      0x0e8 0x2e0 0x4e0 0x16 
> 0x000
>  
>  #define MX25_PAD_LD9__LD9                    0x0ec 0x2e4 0x000 0x00 0x000
>  #define MX25_PAD_LD9__UART4_TXD                      0x0ec 0x2e4 0x000 0x02 
> 0x000
> @@ -316,7 +317,8 @@
>  #define MX25_PAD_CSI_D5__CSPI3_RDY           0x12c 0x324 0x000 0x07 0x000
>  
>  #define MX25_PAD_CSI_D6__CSI_D6                      0x130 0x328 0x000 0x00 
> 0x000
> -#define MX25_PAD_CSI_D6__SDHC2_CMD           0x130 0x328 0x4e0 0x02 0x001
> +/* The eSDHC cannot work if SION is not set for the bidirectional CMD 
> signal. */
> +#define MX25_PAD_CSI_D6__SDHC2_CMD           0x130 0x328 0x4e0 0x12 0x001
>  #define MX25_PAD_CSI_D6__SIM1_PD0            0x130 0x328 0x000 0x04 0x000
>  #define MX25_PAD_CSI_D6__GPIO_1_31           0x130 0x328 0x000 0x05 0x000
>  
> @@ -496,6 +498,8 @@
>  #define MX25_PAD_KPP_COL3__GPIO_3_4          0x1c4 0x3bc 0x000 0x05 0x000
>  
>  #define MX25_PAD_FEC_MDC__FEC_MDC            0x1c8 0x3c0 0x000 0x00 0x000
> +/* The eSDHC cannot work if SION is not set for the bidirectional CMD 
> signal. */
> +#define MX25_PAD_FEC_MDC__SDHC2_CMD          0x1c8 0x3c0 0x4e0 0x11 0x002
>  #define MX25_PAD_FEC_MDC__AUD4_TXD           0x1c8 0x3c0 0x464 0x02 0x001
>  #define MX25_PAD_FEC_MDC__GPIO_3_5           0x1c8 0x3c0 0x000 0x05 0x000

I double checked the numbers, and these seem all to be correct.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Reply via email to