William Lee Irwin III a ?crit : >> The proper way to do this is to convert the large system hashtable >> users to use some data structure / algorithm other than hashing by >> separate chaining.
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 08:41:01PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > No thanks. This was already discussed to death on netdev. To date, hash > tables are a good compromise. > I dont mind losing part of memory, I prefer to keep good performance when > handling 1.000.000 or more tcp sessions. The data structures perform well enough, but I suppose it's not worth pushing the issue this way. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
