4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>

commit 9d98bcec731756b8688b59ec998707924d716d7b upstream.

On a 4-socket Brickland system, hot-removing one ioapic is fine.
Hot-removing the 2nd one causes panic in mp_unregister_ioapic()
while calling release_resource().

It is because the iomem_res pointer has already been released
when removing the first ioapic.

To explain the use of &res[num] here: res is assigned to ioapic_resources,
and later in ioapic_insert_resources() we do:

        struct resource *r = ioapic_resources;

        for_each_ioapic(i) {
                insert_resource(&iomem_resource, r);
                r++;
        }

Here 'r' is treated as an arry of 'struct resource', and the r++ ensures
that each element of the array is inserted separately. Thus we should call
release_resouce() on each element at &res[num].

Fix it by assigning the correct pointers to ioapics[i].iomem_res in
ioapic_setup_resources().

Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -2592,8 +2592,8 @@ static struct resource * __init ioapic_s
                res[num].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
                snprintf(mem, IOAPIC_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE, "IOAPIC %u", i);
                mem += IOAPIC_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE;
+               ioapics[i].iomem_res = &res[num];
                num++;
-               ioapics[i].iomem_res = res;
        }
 
        ioapic_resources = res;


Reply via email to