On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2018 18:53:19 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:46 PM, <mario.limoncie...@dell.com> wrote:
>> >> Ok. Then we need to stick with 5 arguments... What about name
>> >> dell_fill_request()? E.g.
>> > + struct calling_interface_buffer buffer = {CLASS_INFO,
>> > + SELECT_RFKILL,
>> > + {0, 0, 0, 0},
>> > + {0, 0, 0, 0}};
>>
>> Looking to this approach I would rather provide a macro then.
>>
>> #define FILL_REQUEST(a,b,c,d,...) \ // variant FILL_RFKILL_REQUEST(a,b,c,d)
>> (struct calling_interface_buffer) { \
>> ... \
>> }
>>
>> But then it is macro(s) vs. function(s) debate.
>
> Does not matter, I'm fine with either macro or function.
Mario, it's now up to you. Choose one of the option and send new version.
Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
