On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:38:07AM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > It seems pointless to have a timer to update PELT if the system is > completely idle, and when it isn't we can piggy back other events to > make the updates happen.
Only if we do that update before making decisions based on the values. The thing I was bothered by in the earlier patches was that wakeup would use whatever current value and async kick something to go update. That just seems wrong.
