On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:50:55PM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Johan Hovold 於 2018/1/30 下午 12:11 寫道:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:58:47PM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c b/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c
> >> index a054f69446fd..f3ee537d643c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c
> >> @@ -769,8 +769,7 @@ static struct usb_serial_driver f81232_device = {
> >> },
> >> .id_table = id_table,
> >> .num_ports = 1,
> >> - .bulk_in_size = 256,
> >> - .bulk_out_size = 256,
> >> + .bulk_out_size = 16,
> >
> > So it seems you should really be setting bulk_in_size to 64 here (and
> > possibly leave bulk_out_size unset) as that would appear to match your
> > device buffer sizes.
>
> Yes, we want to set the bulk_in_size as 64. The public datasheet has
> some error with bulk in/out, the correct size is 64.
>
> We had test the bulk_out_size set the same with internal TX FIFO will
> make the best performance in tests, but it's ok to set 64. In my opinion
> , I'll prefer to set 16.
Having larger URB buffers than the endpoint size is typically more
efficient, but sometimes there are hardware issues that needs to be
worked around.
Johan
