* Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote: > [...] Clearing R10 is mostly useless in the syscall path because we'll just > unconditionally reload it in do_syscall_64().
AFAICS do_syscall_64() doesn't touch R10 at all. So how does it reload R10? In fact do_syscall_64() as a C function does not touch R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15 - it passes their values through. What am I missing? Thanks, Ingo