On Tue, May 22 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > >@@ -1709,12 +1710,11 @@ static int __init sjcd_init(void)
> > >   printk(KERN_INFO "SJCD: Resetting: ");
> > >   sjcd_send_cmd(SCMD_RESET);
> > >   for (i = 1000; i > 0 && !sjcd_status_valid; --i) {
> > >-          unsigned long timer;
> > >-
> > >           /*
> > >            * Wait 10ms approx.
> > >            */
> > >-          for (timer = jiffies; time_before_eq(jiffies, timer););
> > >+          msleep(10);
> > >+
> > 
> > I always worry when I see code like this, wondering if there is some 
> > arcane reason that I cannot fathom, that is being removed.  You gotta 
> > wonder how long it has been since this driver was used, by anybody.
> > 
> > Oh well, I cannot find fault with the patch, paranoia worries aside.
> 
> well, while i dont have that hardware, i found this by booting an 
> allyesconfig bzImage which runs the code above, which locks up without 
> this change. And then it booted fine with this change. So arcane issues 
> aside, it does visibly improve things ;-)

But if you looked at the driver, you'd see 2 other identical busy loops
in the very same function :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to