On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:09:38PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> --- linux-2622-rc2.orig/kernel/printk.c
> +++ linux-2622-rc2/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -458,9 +458,17 @@ static int __init printk_time_setup(char
> printk_time = 1;
> return 1;
> }
> -
> __setup("time", printk_time_setup);
>
> +static int __init printk_notime_setup(char *str)
> +{
> + if (*str)
> + return 0;
> + printk_time = 0;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("notime", printk_notime_setup);
> +
> __attribute__((weak)) unsigned long long printk_clock(void)
> {
> return sched_clock();
Not disagreeing with the patch, but I wonder if it'd be a net win
if we had a helper that would replace the zillion instances
of "set this variable to a 0/1 depending if its prefixed with 'no'"
with 1-2 lines.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
