> -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chuck Ebbert > Envoyé : 21 mai 2007 18:24 > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700 > >> Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release. > >> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :( ... > > > > If only it would fix all of them... > > > > Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in > > 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before > > 2.6.21 was released). > > Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of > the bugs haven't appeared. > > Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...
Hi, If there is a new stable 2.6.20 / 2.6.21, would it be possible that they both contain also this patch to keep the same behaviour between 2.6.20 -> 2.6.22 kernels regarding paravirt_ops GPL export? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7 Thnx! - vin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
