* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:28:38PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Separate would be better, it makes sense and is one problem less to worry
> > about?
>
> Something like so then?
Yeah, perfect!
> I'm not entirely sure which commit wants to fo in Fixes, I picked the earlier
> one, but it could equally have been:
>
> Fixes: f208820a321f ("Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify
> indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()"")
I'll leave the tag out (in case a rebase has to be done), as these commits are
close enough to each other and are also in a single backporting block of
commits.
Thanks,
Ingo
