4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>

commit 9903a91c763ecdae333a04a9d89d79d2b8966503 upstream.

With pipe-user-pages-hard set to 'N', users were actually only allowed up
to 'N - 1' buffers; and likewise for pipe-user-pages-soft.

Fix this to allow up to 'N' buffers, as would be expected.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180111052902.14409-5-ebigge...@gmail.com
Fixes: b0b91d18e2e9 ("pipe: fix limit checking in pipe_set_size()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawre...@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcg...@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpa...@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/pipe.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -609,12 +609,12 @@ static unsigned long account_pipe_buffer
 
 static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
 {
-       return pipe_user_pages_soft && user_bufs >= pipe_user_pages_soft;
+       return pipe_user_pages_soft && user_bufs > pipe_user_pages_soft;
 }
 
 static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
 {
-       return pipe_user_pages_hard && user_bufs >= pipe_user_pages_hard;
+       return pipe_user_pages_hard && user_bufs > pipe_user_pages_hard;
 }
 
 static bool is_unprivileged_user(void)


Reply via email to