On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:35:46PM -0800, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.row...@sony.com>
> 
> Errors while developing the patch to create of_overlay_fdt_apply()
> exposed inadequate error messages to debug problems when overlay
> devicetree fragment nodes contain an invalid target path.  Improve
> the messages in find_target_node() to remedy this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.row...@sony.com>
> ---
> 
> changes from v2:
>   - add fragment node name as suggested by Geert
>   - existing error message printed short node name, thus not
>     discriminating between fragments; change to full node name
>   - existing error message printed node address, which is devicetree
>     internal debugging, not useful in an overlay apply error message;
>     remove node address from message
> 
>  drivers/of/overlay.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> index 5f6c5569e97d..852e566d7744 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> @@ -488,20 +488,30 @@ static int build_changeset(struct overlay_changeset 
> *ovcs)
>   */
>  static struct device_node *find_target_node(struct device_node *info_node)
>  {
> +     struct device_node *node;
>       const char *path;
>       u32 val;
>       int ret;
>  
>       ret = of_property_read_u32(info_node, "target", &val);
> -     if (!ret)
> -             return of_find_node_by_phandle(val);
> +     if (!ret) {
> +             node = of_find_node_by_phandle(val);
> +             if (!node)
> +                     pr_err("find target, node: %pOF, phandle 0x%x not 
> found\n",

I'm wondering if the core should print the error rather than having all 
the callers do it. The question is whether there are cases where failing 
is okay? I guess sometimes we use 0 to skip cells, but the core handle 
not printing an error in that case.

Rob

> +                            info_node, val);
> +             return node;
> +     }
>  
>       ret = of_property_read_string(info_node, "target-path", &path);
> -     if (!ret)
> -             return of_find_node_by_path(path);
> +     if (!ret) {
> +             node =  of_find_node_by_path(path);
> +             if (!node)
> +                     pr_err("find target, node: %pOF, path '%s' not found\n",
> +                            info_node, path);
> +             return node;
> +     }
>  
> -     pr_err("Failed to find target for node %p (%s)\n",
> -             info_node, info_node->name);
> +     pr_err("find target, node: %pOF, no target property\n", info_node);
>  
>       return NULL;
>  }
> -- 
> Frank Rowand <frank.row...@sony.com>
> 

Reply via email to