On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 07:46:29PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> ed fs/ext2/inode.c <<EOF
> /ext2_notify_change/
> /size >> 33/
> s/33/32/
> w
> q
> EOF
Good spotting but wrong fix.
Right fix for 2.2.x:
--- 33/fs/ext2/inode.c.~1~ Sun Nov 12 00:45:43 2000
+++ 33/fs/ext2/inode.c Sun Nov 19 02:02:51 2000
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@
}
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
- if (size >> 33) {
+ if (size >> 31) {
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct ext2_super_block *es = sb->u.ext2_sb.s_es;
if (!(es->s_feature_ro_compat &
Fix for 2.4.0-test11-pre6:
--- 2.4.0-test11-pre6/fs/ext2/inode.c.~1~ Thu Nov 16 15:37:32 2000
+++ 2.4.0-test11-pre6/fs/ext2/inode.c Sun Nov 19 02:07:03 2000
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@
raw_inode->i_dir_acl = cpu_to_le32(inode->u.ext2_i.i_dir_acl);
else {
raw_inode->i_size_high = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_size >> 32);
- if (raw_inode->i_size_high) {
+ if (inode->i_size >> 31) {
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct ext2_super_block *es = sb->u.ext2_sb.s_es;
if (!(es->s_feature_ro_compat &
cpu_to_le32(EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE))) {
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
