4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>

commit 1c130ae00b769a2e2df41bad3d6051ee8234b636 upstream.

Mike Christie reports:
  Starting in 4.14 iscsi logins will fail around 50% of the time.

Problem appears to be that iscsi_target_sk_data_ready() callback may
return without doing anything in case it finds the login work queue
is still blocked in sock_recvmsg().

Nicholas Bellinger says:
  It would indicate users providing their own ->sk_data_ready() callback
  must be responsible for waking up a kthread context blocked on
  sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL), when a second ->sk_data_ready() is
  received before the first sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL) completes.

So, do this and invoke the original data_ready() callback -- in
case of tcp sockets this takes care of waking the thread.

Disclaimer: I do not understand why this problem did not show up before
tcp prequeue removal.

(Drop WARN_ON usage - nab)

Reported-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]>
Bisected-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]>
Diagnosed-by: Nicholas Bellinger <[email protected]>
Fixes: e7942d0633c4 ("tcp: remove prequeue support")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
+++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
@@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ static void iscsi_target_sk_data_ready(s
        if (test_and_set_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags)) {
                write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
                pr_debug("Got LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE=1, conn: %p >>>>\n", 
conn);
+               if (iscsi_target_sk_data_ready == conn->orig_data_ready)
+                       return;
+               conn->orig_data_ready(sk);
                return;
        }
 


Reply via email to