On 22/02/18 09:04, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On Monday 12 Feb 2018 at 18:45:23 (+0000), Sudeep Holla wrote:
> [...]
>> +/*
>> + * perf_ops->freq_set is not a synchronous, the actual OPP change will
>> + * happen asynchronously and can get notified if the events are
>> + * subscribed for by the SCMI firmware
>> + */
>> +static int
>> +scmi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
>> +{
>> + struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> + struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops = handle->perf_ops;
>> + u64 freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
>> +
>> + return perf_ops->freq_set(handle, priv->domain_id, freq, false);
>> +}
>
> Is arch_set_freq_scale() needed in this function ?
>
Yes indeed, already added locally[1] after Dietmar started the discussion.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
[1] https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/linux/h/for-list/new_arm_scmi
