On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero ><m...@maciej.szmigiero.name> wrote: >> This reverts commit 92a8046c9d952a2a7d21dfcd3afadc72a0bc0f72. >> >> Now that the patch series changing ISA_BUS_API dependency to selection >> was merged this reversion will do the same for gpio-winbond driver to >> make it consistent with other ISA bus gpio drivers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <m...@maciej.szmigiero.name> > >I still see a number of other users of 'depends on ISA_BUS_API' in linux-next: > >drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on ISA_BUS_API >drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on ISA_BUS_API >drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && X86 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/iio/counter/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && X86 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig: depends on X86 && ISA_BUS_API >drivers/watchdog/Kconfig: depends on X86 && ISA_BUS_API > >Did you change all of the above? I would really like to avoid mixing >'select' and 'depends on' here, as that will likely cause other circular >dependencies in the future. > > Arnd
Those 'depends on' for ISA_BUS_API are resolved in the devel branch of the linux-gpio tree; this revert patch should be applied there before being picked up later for linux-next. William Breathitt Gray
