On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:05:36PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > great. Btw., could you please keep the "up to this point there should be > no behavioral change in CFS" fundamental splitup of your patches -
sure ..basically the changes required in CFS core is the introduction of two structures - struct sched_entity and struct lrq and generalization of cfs routines to operate on these structures rather than on task_struct/rq structures directly. In the first split, I will ensure that this generalization is applied only to tasks (which represents reorganization of core with no behavioral/functional change in scheduler) and in a subsequent split/patch I will apply the generalization to uids also (which will add group fairness aspect to scheduler), as you require. Thanks for your feedback so far! > that way i can look at the core changes (and possibly apply them) without > having to consider the uid based changes (which do change behavior and > which need more upstream buy-in). -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
