On 2018/2/24 10:47, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/2/9 14:13, jiangyiwen wrote: >> User use some syscall, for example mmap(v9fs_file_mmap), it will not >> update atime even if user's mnt_flags have MNT_NOATIME, because >> v9fs default set SB_NOATIME in v9fs_set_super. >> >> For supporting access time is updated when user mount with relatime, >> we should clear SB_NOATIME by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <[email protected]> >> --- >> fs/9p/vfs_super.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c >> index af03c2a..48ce504 100644 >> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c >> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c >> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int v9fs_set_super(struct super_block *s, void >> *data) >> if (v9ses->cache) >> sb->s_bdi->ra_pages = (VM_MAX_READAHEAD * 1024)/PAGE_SIZE; >> >> - sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE | SB_DIRSYNC | SB_NOATIME; >> + sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE | SB_DIRSYNC; >> if (!v9ses->cache) >> sb->s_flags |= SB_SYNCHRONOUS; >> > Hi Alexander Viro and Eric, > > My patch has already sent two weeks, but nobody help me > to review, I have a question about now who is the v9fs's > maintainer? Or who can help me review the patch? > > I hope v9fs's maintainer can give me some advices or > merge into the mainline if it has no problem. > > Thanks, > Yiwen. > Hi Andrew,
My patch has already sent more than two weeks, but nobody help me to review, I have a question about now who is the v9fs's maintainer? Or who can help me review the patch? I hope v9fs's maintainer can give me some advices or merge into the mainline if it has no problem. Thanks, Yiwen.
