Hi Wolfram, On 02/27/2018 02:35 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Since you raised concern on the patch I thought of reworking this patch. But I can see that this patch is already applied for i2c/for-next. Kindly let me know whether I should be sending follow-up patches on top of i2c/for-next ?Oops, that was a mistake on my side. I'll revert that patch. Please think of the patch as not-applied-yet.
Okay Noted!!
Thanks!
Regards, -George
